tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4305888946584866654.post9088997523597770229..comments2024-03-18T18:33:59.080-07:00Comments on The Left Chapter: The externalized enemy: Conspiracy theories and the leftUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4305888946584866654.post-44683492474818646822015-09-12T05:24:03.504-07:002015-09-12T05:24:03.504-07:00You are wrong on this one,9/11. The critics of the...You are wrong on this one,9/11. The critics of the govts' official 9/11 conspiracy theory are now made-up of countless intellectuals,professionals,ex-intel officers,ex-minister,etc..experts from different political perspectives. Some of these people include Robert D. Steele, a veteran CIA & US intel officer whom has been featured on countless alternative programs critiquing the permanent war economy;former Supreme Italian Judge whom had presided over cases involving the mafia and the Cold War's Gladio(NATO) terror network, Ferdinando Imposimato; Francesco Cossiga,former Italian President and head of internal affairs during the murder of PM Aldo Moro allegedly by the REd Brigades (which were infiltrated and undermined by NATO,as exposed by security expert and scholar Dr. Daniele Ganser); Paul T. Hellyer, Canadian defence minister under PM Pearson,The list is countless of these experts and they are not the David Icke reptilian kind. Visit the site Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice http://stj911.org; Architects and Engrs for 9/11 Truth,www.ae911truth.org,;A peer-reviewed research source, http://www.consensus911.org/,.------------------------In regards to Chomsky he has been intellectually dishonest when he publicly admitted "[Scientists seeking the truth about 9/11] are not doing what scientists and engineers do when they think they’ve discovered something. What you do, when you think you have discovered something, is you write articles in scientific journals [he admits to “one or two minor articles”], give talks at the professional societies, and go to the Civil Engineering Department at MIT, or Florida or wherever you are, and present your results.”---------Former UnderWriter Lab employee and whistleblower Kevin Ryan has written an explosive book on the issue and has had several email exchanges with Chomsky proving that Chomsky isn't truthful on this matter. Kevin has provided him with his book (Another Nineteen). Ryan writes " I copied Chomsky on more than two peer-reviewed scientific articles in mainstream journals that describe evidence for demolition at the WTC. Therefore he knows that this statement is not true. And I’ve given dozens of talks around the U.S. and Canada that focused on the WTC demolition theory, many of which were at universities.<br /><br />I’ve also pointed out that MIT’s civil engineering professor Eduardo Kausel made elementary mistakes in his public comments about the WTC disaster. Kausel claimed in Scientific American that the WTC towers were “never designed for the the intense jet fuel fires—a key design omission.” Kausel also claimed that jet fuel from the aircraft “softened or melted the structural elements—floor trusses and columns—so that they became like chewing gum.” At the risk of making a Chomsky-like exaggeration, I’ll venture that nearly everyone today knows that these statements are false." For Ryan's complete article see: http://digwithin.net/2013/11/29/chomsky/Michele Penguehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01025130886794273802noreply@blogger.com